Organizations join effort to halt special
bailout bank loss tax rule

December 8, 2008

A letter is circulating as part of an effort to get Congress to halt and reverse the now infamous bank loss rule.

As you probably recall since I've blogged about it quite a bit, the tax code was changed as part of emergency stimulus, aka bailout, efforts. Now some banks that buy floundering financial institutions can simply ignore the tax law that prevents them from using the losses of the acquired banks to help reduce their, the buying banks', tax bills.

Several members of the House and Senate tax-writing committees have introduced legislation to stop this special tax break (blogged about here) and also have directly written the man who initiated the change, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson (blogged here).

Now advocacy groups and other tax- and budget-related organizations are joining the effort to get the bills enacted. They are signing a letter (you can see a PDF copy, including who has signed so far, by clicking here) that asks lawmakers to cosponsor the recently-introduced legislation that would reverse the Treasury edict.

States joining the recall effort: Among the signers are many state groups. While the law change is estimated to cost the federal government $140 billion in revenue, state treasuries also are in trouble because states tend to have business tax systems that are linked to the federal corporate tax.

"California, for example, will reportedly lose $2 billion if the Treasury notice is allowed to stand," according to the letter. "This is particularly problematic because many state legislatures face procedural obstacles to enacting any legislation that would increase revenues to make up for this unexpected corporate tax cut."

If you're an official representative of a group that would like to be added to the signatories, you can e-sign the letter by clicking here.

You can sign, too! Individual taxpayers, who are footing this and other bailout bill provisions, also can get in on the act.

Citizens for Tax Justice has created a similar letter for individuals to sign and send to Congress simply by filling out a form at this special Web page.

Share:

The More Tax Posts tab at the top of this page will take you to, well, more tax posts. You also can search below for a tax topic. 

Latest Posts
Inflation helps Social Security beneficiaries some, but hurts retirees more

June 10, 2026

Inflation is a double-edged sword for retirees. Cost-of-living increases will bump up Social Security payments…

Read More
Tax Season 2026 Continues!

We made it. Tax Day 2025 is finally over. For most of us. When the filing season started on Jan. 26, millions who were expecting refunds filed immediately. Most of us got our returns to the Internal Revenue Service by April 15. But plenty of taxpayers also got extensions. They are looking at an Oct. 15 filing deadline.

Those procrastinating filers aren’t a problem. In fact, the IRS appreciates taxpayers who take time to fill out their 1040 forms correctly. It also is grateful that tax submissions are spread out a bit, especially now that the IRS is a leaner agency. Processing returns is easier when they arrive throughout the year instead of in massive bunches.

But enough about Uncle Sam’s tax collection issues. The focus now is on all y’all who filed for extensions, giving you another six months to complete your return. Since your new mid-October due date will be here before you know it, let’s get started now on meeting it.

The ol’ blog is here to help you finish up your extended Form 1040. You can start with January’s tax tips page, which has links to the rest of the year’s tips by-month collections. You also can peruse various tax categories for more tailored advice by clicking on the More Tax Posts drop-down menu at the top of this (and every) page.

And to make sure you don’t miss your new filing deadline, the count-down clock below will let you know just how much time you to file by Oct. 15. At the latest.e. (Note: I’m in the Central Time Zone, so adjust accordingly for where you live.)

Comments