Discussing ‘death tax’ alternatives

March 12, 2008

Sorry for that headline. Love the alliteration, but disagree (as detailed in this blog post) with those who use impending mortality as a semantic tool to get the estate tax repealed.

Estate_tax_capitol_2
Actually, the the estate tax will soon disappear, but for one year only in 2010. Then it is scheduled to go back on the books in a more stringent incarnation the following year.

As blogged previously (here and here), lawmakers have been fighting, mostly along party lines, on how to deal with this tax, both in the near and long terms.

The discussion on just what to do about the estate tax continued today at a Senate Finance Committee hearing on Alternatives to the Current Federal Estate Tax System. It was the second in a series of Senate Finance Committee examinations of the estate tax system. A third hearing on the issue will be in April.

In his opening remarks, Committee Chairman Max Baucus (Dem.-Montana) expressed hope that he and his colleagues could take an outside-the-box look at the current estate tax laws and potential bipartisan reform possibilities,

Good luck with that bipartisan goal, Mr. Chairman. But Baucus got it right when he noted that the estate tax laws are complicated, intimidating and, thanks to temporary law changes, uncertain in application.

As for ways to deal with those estate tax concerns, today’s hearing looked at taxing beneficiaries, income exclusions and how other countries tax estates. The witnesses were three tax professors:

Click on the profs’ names to read their formal testimony.

Additional information: In conjunction with the hearing, the Joint Committee on Taxation (kudos for a much improved Web site design, by the way) released the document Description and Analysis of Alternative Wealth Transfer Tax Systems.

You can read Baucus’ pre-hearing statement here, as well as the release he issued following the session here.

And if you’ve got about an hour and a half, you can watch the hearing here (RealPlayer required, and it takes a few minutes to download even at high ISP speeds).

I have the hearing playing in the background as I type this. Not to worry KPLU and KUT; SFC will not replace y’all on my Internet radio dial!

Share:

The More Tax Posts tab at the top of this page will take you to, well, more tax posts. You also can search below for a tax topic. 

Latest Posts
6 tax moves to consider this June

June 3, 2026

Definitely take a break this June. But taxes don’t take vacations. So, you also should…

Read More
Tax Season 2026 Continues!

We made it. Tax Day 2025 is finally over. For most of us. When the filing season started on Jan. 26, millions who were expecting refunds filed immediately. Most of us got our returns to the Internal Revenue Service by April 15. But plenty of taxpayers also got extensions. They are looking at an Oct. 15 filing deadline.

Those procrastinating filers aren’t a problem. In fact, the IRS appreciates taxpayers who take time to fill out their 1040 forms correctly. It also is grateful that tax submissions are spread out a bit, especially now that the IRS is a leaner agency. Processing returns is easier when they arrive throughout the year instead of in massive bunches.

But enough about Uncle Sam’s tax collection issues. The focus now is on all y’all who filed for extensions, giving you another six months to complete your return. Since your new mid-October due date will be here before you know it, let’s get started now on meeting it.

The ol’ blog is here to help you finish up your extended Form 1040. You can start with January’s tax tips page, which has links to the rest of the year’s tips by-month collections. You also can peruse various tax categories for more tailored advice by clicking on the More Tax Posts drop-down menu at the top of this (and every) page.

And to make sure you don’t miss your new filing deadline, the count-down clock below will let you know just how much time you to file by Oct. 15. At the latest.e. (Note: I’m in the Central Time Zone, so adjust accordingly for where you live.)

Comments