More ‘Amazon taxes’ advance in states

February 18, 2010

Attention online shoppers. States are moving forward in their efforts to collect sales taxes on items purchased from remote retailers.  

This week, the Virginia Senate approved a measure that would require Internet retailers to collect the Old Dominion's 5 percent sales tax

Virginia lawmakers say they are justified in demanding their version of the so-called Amazon tax, named after the popular online retailer, because the Seattle, Wash.-based company has two facilities in Northern Virginia.

The bill goes further, however, by also citing presumed nexus, or physical presence, in the state based on a company's agreements with affiliates. 

In this case, a business is presumed for Virginia retail sales and use tax purposes to be transacting business in the state if it enters into an agreement with a Virginia resident who directly or indirectly refers potential customers. This referral could be, under the bill, as simple as a link on an Internet site.

Don't freak out yet shoppers and Virginia bloggers with Amazon ads on your sites. 

Despite the estimated $18 million in sales tax revenue the Virginia Retail Federation says the new tax could bring in, Virginia's House is not likely to pass the bill.

Up the road in Vermont, lawmakers have introduced their own Amazon bill that presumes nexus for sales tax purposes.

Both the Virginia and Vermont measures would exempt smaller companies and would be "rebuttable." That is, the presumption that the online site was an agent of Amazon or other remote seller could be countered by proof that the state resident who operates the site did not engage in any solicitation on behalf of the remote retailer.

Congressional interest, too: Meanwhile, federal lawmakers also are taking a look at Internet sales taxes.

At a roundtable earlier this month in Washington, tax experts agreed that Amazon laws are not the best solution. State-by-state nexus bills chip away at the problem, but the best move would be federal legislation that would streamline state tax collections nationwide. 

Unfortunately, noted most panelists at the session, Congress appears unwilling to act on a streamlining bill for the foreseeable future.

The session, sponsored by Tax Analysts, came on the heels of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law hearing looking into the role of Congress in defining tax nexus.

In written testimony, Joe Henchman, the Tax Foundation's Counsel and Director of State Projects, lent his support to the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement. 

"It is not new for states to seek revenues by shifting tax burdens away from the majority of voting residents, such as with changing nexus rules," said Henchman. "Because economic integration is greater now than it has ever been before, the economic costs of nexus uncertainty are also greater today and can ripple through the economy much more quickly."

The better solution, said Henchman, is Congressional adoption of a physical presence standard that would prevent burdens to interstate commerce. That would accomplish two things:

  1. It would limit "destructive and likely unconstitutional state efforts to export tax burdens," and 
  2. It would decrease transaction costs for interstate commerce, especially for small businesses using mail and the Internet.

Henchman also warned that as electronic commerce has increased, "some seem to view it as a golden goose that can be squeezed without adverse effects on economic growth. It must be understood that the availability of many items in electronic commerce could be hindered if states are permitted to adopt economic nexus standards."

Related posts:

Want to tell your friends about this blog post? Click the Tweet This or Digg This buttons below or use the Share This icon to spread the word via e-mail, Facebook and other popular applications. Thanks!

Share:

The More Tax Posts tab at the top of this page will take you to, well, more tax posts. You also can search below for a tax topic. 

Latest Posts
The latest Dirty Dozen tax scam list is familiar because too many are still falling for the schemes

March 5, 2026

Tax filing season is also peak time for tax scams. Be on the lookout for…

Read More
Hello Tax Season 2026

Happy New Tax Year! Are you ready to file your 2025 tax return? I know, too early to ask. But Tax Day 2026 will be here before we realize it. The Internal Revenue Service deadline to file and pay any tax we owe is the regular April 15 date this year. It’s also Tax Day for most of the states that collect income taxes from their residents, which is most of the states! If that seems too far away right now, don’t worry. As is the case every tax season, the ol’ blog’s tips and other tax reminders should help all of us meet our state and federal responsibilities. Procrastinators also will want to keep an eye on the countdown clock just below. It tracks how much time we have until April’s Tax Day, just in case we put off our annual tax task until the absolutely final hours and decide we need to instead get an extension request into the IRS by that date. (Note: I’m in the Central Time Zone, so adjust accordingly for where you live.)

Comments
  • Here is a perfect example of the negative affect the affiliate tax can have on revenue. I have been a successful affiliate marketer living in North Carolina for a number of years. Because of the “Amazon Tax” that was passed in that state I moved to Tennessee, and with me went my tax dollars and local spending.

  • Be vigilant and careful in supporting new tax bills.

  • Here in Illinois, I’ve been getting emails from affiliate networks about a proposed bill as well.
    “An advertising tax bill has been proposed in Illinois (SB 3393)…Please help to fight this legislation in your state!”

Leave your comment