Debunking 5 Bush tax cut myths

July 31, 2010

Sorry to be a broken record on the soon-to-expire tax cuts that we got in 2001 and 2003 when Dubya was in office, but lots of folks seem fixated on the upcoming Dec. 31, 2010, deadline of late.

The most recent piece I've seen is from William G. Gale, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution and co-director of the Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center. Gale debunks five myths about the Bush tax cuts in an article for the Washington Post.

I'll let you go there for details, but as a quick preview, here are the myths themselves:

  1. Extending the tax cuts would be a good way to stimulate the economy. 
  2. Allowing the high-income tax cuts to expire would hurt small businesses. 
  3. Making the tax cuts permanent will lead to long-term growth. 
  4. The Bush tax cuts are the main cause of the budget deficit.
  5. Continuing the tax cuts won't doom the long-term fiscal picture; entitlements are the real problem.

As  you can see, Gale's take on the cuts and what to do about them is probably going to upset folks who are for letting at least some of them expire, as well as those who want them made permanent, although pro-cut folks take a harder hit in this myth buster piece.

Related posts:

Want to tell your friends about this blog post? Click the Tweet This or Digg This buttons below or use the Share This icon to spread the word via e-mail, Facebook and other popular applications. Thanks!

Share:

The More Tax Posts tab at the top of this page will take you to, well, more tax posts. You also can search below for a tax topic. 

Latest Posts
6 tax moves to consider this June

June 3, 2026

Definitely take a break this June. But taxes don’t take vacations. So, you also should…

Read More
Tax Season 2026 Continues!

We made it. Tax Day 2025 is finally over. For most of us. When the filing season started on Jan. 26, millions who were expecting refunds filed immediately. Most of us got our returns to the Internal Revenue Service by April 15. But plenty of taxpayers also got extensions. They are looking at an Oct. 15 filing deadline.

Those procrastinating filers aren’t a problem. In fact, the IRS appreciates taxpayers who take time to fill out their 1040 forms correctly. It also is grateful that tax submissions are spread out a bit, especially now that the IRS is a leaner agency. Processing returns is easier when they arrive throughout the year instead of in massive bunches.

But enough about Uncle Sam’s tax collection issues. The focus now is on all y’all who filed for extensions, giving you another six months to complete your return. Since your new mid-October due date will be here before you know it, let’s get started now on meeting it.

The ol’ blog is here to help you finish up your extended Form 1040. You can start with January’s tax tips page, which has links to the rest of the year’s tips by-month collections. You also can peruse various tax categories for more tailored advice by clicking on the More Tax Posts drop-down menu at the top of this (and every) page.

And to make sure you don’t miss your new filing deadline, the count-down clock below will let you know just how much time you to file by Oct. 15. At the latest.e. (Note: I’m in the Central Time Zone, so adjust accordingly for where you live.)

Comments
  • property passed on to spouses gets essentially unlimited exemption from estate (not inheritance!) tax. they need to hire a financial planner to figure out best way to pass on property. rich folks have been avoiding this for years, so it’s possible. less than 2 percent of all taxpayers end up paying an estate tax

  • Pamela Baggett

    We really MUST NOT reinstate the inheritance tax. I have friends whose land has been in family for five or more generations. NO WAY they can afford the inheritance tax on this. How do they avoid this killer?

  • It doesn’t affect most businesses. Just most business income

    As most businesses nowadays are pass-through entitites — S corporations or LLCs — the scheduled increase in the top individual…

  • I read the analysis and didn’t see one thing supporting maintaining the tax cuts for the upper income folks. 25% of the deficit is a whopping price to pay for one of the least effective stimulants to the economy, particularly as it raises interest rates in general through causing more government debt to compete for investment funds. The net benefit to the economy was estimated to be negative. Seems like a slam dunk.

Comments are closed.