Many of my friends are at Kentucky Derby parties today. It's not so much that they are horse or horse racing folks. They just want to get together and have an excuse to put on a fancy hat. I'm talking about both male and female friends here.
But there are those for whom betting is the best part of the Derby or any race.
Horse racing folks, however, say the amount of betting has declined, in part because of the Internal Revenue Service requirements on reporting race winnings.
In a letter to the IRS, the Washington, D.C., law firm Davis & Harman LLP explains:
"In part, due to current tax laws, U.S. wagering on parimutuel horse
racing has declined from a high of $15.18 billion in 2003 to $10.87
billion in 2012. The parimutuel horse racing industry — representing
nearly 1,000 off-track wagering service sites, as well as some 200
racetracks — has lost market share as horseplayers migrate to other
forms of gambling entertainment that do not withhold on winnings over
$5,000. This migration is not because of a desire to avoid taxes, but
because of over-withholding."
The firm, representing the National Thoroughbred Racing Association and the American Horse Council,
is asking that for withholding and reporting purposes an "amount
wagered" include the total amount bet by the winning bettor of the proceeds in the parimutuel pool.
Basically, argues Davis & Harman on behalf of its horsey clients, the current tax rules that apply to winning wagers on horse racing do not reflect appropriate
or equitable withholding and reporting for the way most betting is done
today.
Current wagering withholding law: Tax law now says that withholding is required if the
wagering proceeds are more than $5,000 from "a wagering transaction in a
parimutuel pool with respect to horse races, dog races, or jai alai if
the amount of such proceeds is at least 300 times as large as the amount
wagered."
The problem, says the firm, is that the law's interpretation of what is considered as the "amount
wagered" doesn't take into account all the combinations a patron bets into a
pool in an attempt to produce a winning ticket. The IRS now looks at only the cost of the one
winning combination as the amount wagered for withholding
and reporting purposes.
Davis & Harman suggests that, for example, if a bettor places 10 bets into a Trifecta pool on 10 different
combinations of the three horses that will come in first, second, and
third, the cost of all of those bets should be included in the amount
wagered for purposes of withholding.
The letter (available via Tax Analysts; subscription required) offers examples of the current winning bet/withholding situation and how the firm recommends it be changed.
Assume an individual decided to wager a Trifecta (selecting the
first-, second-, and third-place finishers in a race, in exact order).
To improve his or her chances of winning, the individual selects a group
of seven horses in the race and requests a "Trifecta box." By betting a
box, the person wins if any three of the seven horses finishes
one-two-three (in any order). A seven-horse Trifecta box involves 210
different mathematical combinations. If the person bets $20 on each
combination, the total amount wagered is $4,200 ($20 x 210). After the
race, the person held a winning ticket that paid $6,100 (which is odds
of 305 to 1).
Under the current IRS withholding rules, the racetrack would withhold $1,520 since the rules treat the $20 paid for the one winning combination as the only amount wagered. The withholding is computed as follows: $6,100 proceeds from wager less $20 amount bet equals $6,080 in winnings. The required 25 percent withholding would take $1,520 off the top.
The firm argues that the winner has really only won $1,900: $6,100 winnings
less $4,200 wagered in total. So under current law, the current withholding system leaves the winner with a net of only $380, making the
withholding rate 80 percent of the actual winnings.
Suggested wagering withholding changes: The more fair method, argues the law firm, would be for the IRS' payoff computations for the Trifecta detailed above to be changed to define the "amount wagered" as the actual
dollars wagered by that person, or $4,200.
Then the results would be that the bettor would not face withholding because the twin tests of winnings over $5,000 and odds of 300 to 1 or more are not
met: $6,100 winning bet less $4,200 wagered equals $1,900 in winnings.
"The person may be able to get back the over-withholding…by claiming the balance of what was bet on the Trifecta as a
miscellaneous itemized deduction on his or her tax return when it is
filed the following year," according to the letter. "But withholding by this procedure takes that
money out of the wagering cycle for a long time."
Overall IRS requested for guidance: The Davis & Harman letter is just one of many sent to the IRS as part of the agency's annual public comment solicitation of recommendations for its 2013-2014 Guidance Priority List.
The IRS uses the list to prioritize issues it will address through
regulations, revenue rulings, revenue procedures, notices and other
administrative guidance. The guidance is also used to clarify ambiguous areas
of tax law.
I wish all those betting on today's Kentucky Derby good luck.
And I wish the same to Davis & Harman its horse-racing connected clients.
However, I'm not so sure that telling the IRS that tax withholding is one of the reasons that folks are deciding not to bet, at least not bet through legal channels that collect taxes off the top on winnings, is such a persuasive argument.
Run for the Roses betting update: The 139th
running of the Kentucky Derby at Churchill Downs will have a field of
19 horses.
The Kentucky Derby official website offers live odds, as well as a way to bet on the race online.
As I type, folks feeling lucky have bet more than $9.9 million. (Update an hour before post time: Almost $25 million has been bet.)
The purse for the 1¼-mile race that will take about two minutes to complete is almost $2.2 million, with the winner to get $1.44 million of that.
The remaining Triple Crown races are The Preakness in Baltimore on May 18 and the Belmont Stakes from Elmont, N.Y., on June 8. The
last horse to win all three races was Affirmed in 1978.
And if you're looking for some fun bets today, Richard Rosenblatt suggests:
- The O-my! (calling George Takei) $1 trifecta box of Oxbow, Orb and Overanalyze: A $1 trifecta box
on these horses, numbers 2, 9 and 16, will cost $6. If the three come in
first, second and third in any order, you could be a big winner. - The Golden $2 exacta box: A $4 bet on Golden
Soul and Goldencents, numbers 4 and 8. It pays off if the horses are the top
two finishers. - The War Horse $1 four-horse Superfecta box:
Revolutionary, Normandy Invasion, Lines of Battle and Java's War, or the
3-5-11-19 combination. A $1 box will cost $24, but the payoff will
be in the many thousands of dollars if those horses are the top four
finishers in any order.
My favorite option, the Purrfect Pair of Charming Kitten and Fear the Kitten, was nixed when Fear the Kitten was scratched.
Good luck with your picks and don't drink too many Mint Juleps!
You also might find these items of interest:
