Senate health care, take two

September 23, 2009

OK, I'm not going to post every time there's a proposed change to health care reform legislation. I could spend 24/7 doing that, driving both me and y'all crazy(ier).

But since I've given the Senate version, originally announced last week and now being debated in the Senate Finance Committee, a lot of attention, I did want to share some key changes (so far) in the chairman's health care reform proposal.

Individual costs: In his second "mark," or working document,
Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont.), has dramatically reduced the proposed excise
tax that would be assessed folks who didn't purchase insurance.

The maximum penalty for those making more than 300 percent of the federal poverty line would be $1,900 instead of the original $3,800.

He's tweaked the percentage of medical deductions that would be needed to itemize these costs. Right now, you have to have allowable medical costs that exceed 7.5 percent of your adjusted gross income before you can claim them on Schedule A. That would become 10 percent (the same level as required if you fall under the alternative minimum tax, or AMT), effective with the 2013 tax year.

As for flexible spending accounts (FSAs), Baucus now wants to increase his $2,000 cap on contributions to $2,500. That limit would begin with the 2011 tax year.

The Senator would leave his 20 percent penalty (up from 10 percent) on distributions from health savings accounts (HSAs) that aren't used for qualified medical purposes. However, instead of the higher penalty kicking in next year, it wouldn't start until 2011.

A long way to go: The Senate Finance Committee is still slogging through more than 500 amendments (links to which are included in Senate health bill to get major surgery), so there could be more changes. Then it would go to the Senate floor where additional modifications could occur.

And finally, any Senate bill will have to be reconciled with House legislation in a conference committee, meaning yet more changes.

As I said, 24/7 and at the current pace (debate on one amendment this morning took two hours), it could take 365 days, too.

Related posts:

Share:

The More Tax Posts tab at the top of this page will take you to, well, more tax posts. You also can search below for a tax topic. 

Latest Posts
Tropical Storm Arthur’s deadly arrival underscores need for disaster preparation

June 18, 2026

Tropical Storm Arthur as it moved toward the Texas cost on June 17. Its deadly…

Read More
Tax Season 2026 Continues!

We made it. Tax Day 2025 is finally over. For most of us. When the filing season started on Jan. 26, millions who were expecting refunds filed immediately. Most of us got our returns to the Internal Revenue Service by April 15. But plenty of taxpayers also got extensions. They are looking at an Oct. 15 filing deadline.

Those procrastinating filers aren’t a problem. In fact, the IRS appreciates taxpayers who take time to fill out their 1040 forms correctly. It also is grateful that tax submissions are spread out a bit, especially now that the IRS is a leaner agency. Processing returns is easier when they arrive throughout the year instead of in massive bunches.

But enough about Uncle Sam’s tax collection issues. The focus now is on all y’all who filed for extensions, giving you another six months to complete your return. Since your new mid-October due date will be here before you know it, let’s get started now on meeting it.

The ol’ blog is here to help you finish up your extended Form 1040. You can start with January’s tax tips page, which has links to the rest of the year’s tips by-month collections. You also can peruse various tax categories for more tailored advice by clicking on the More Tax Posts drop-down menu at the top of this (and every) page.

And to make sure you don’t miss your new filing deadline, the count-down clock below will let you know just how much time you to file by Oct. 15. At the latest.e. (Note: I’m in the Central Time Zone, so adjust accordingly for where you live.)

Comments
  • Health insurance companies pay an average of 80-90% of what they collect in premiums. After paying all of their administrative costs, that leaves some insurance companies with less than a percent profit. I really wish an independent researcher could step into the media with a bit of insight.

Comments are closed.